[Xen-devel] Re: A random bug introduced in C/S 10918

To:	"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: A random bug introduced in C/S 10918
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:18:38 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:19:02 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<0EBFB99D260C5B40AC33E0F807B1AD66D52C59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcbAZx4ugltCVnl8QUaZNyAwR4A5DwAC2eaqAAIpFDAAALrETw==
Thread-topic:	A random bug introduced in C/S 10918
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620



On 15/8/06 4:00 pm, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> BTW, seems the definition of RO_MPT_VIRT_START is misleading, should be
> RO_PMT_VIRT_START, also the comments around is incorrect.

It *is* the read-only M2P for paravirtual guests. It's just that we reuse
that area of virtual address space for HVM guests. :-)

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: A random bug introduced in C/S 10918