|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 3/8] Allow a kernel to not be in ring 0.
 
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
 
In-Reply-To: <20060803002518.190834642@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:25:13 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
   
We allow for the fact that the guest kernel may not run in ring 0.
This requires some abstraction in a few places when setting %cs or
checking privilege level (user vs kernel).
     
 
I made some changes:
a. Added some comments about the SEGMENT_IS_*_CODE() macros.
b. Added a USER_RPL macro.  (You were comparing a value to a mask
   in some places and to the magic number 3 in other places.)
c. Changed the entry.S tests for LDT stack segment to use the macros.
   
 
 These changes look great.  Ack-ed.  I had some similar ones before that 
never made it from my tree, as I got carried away and tried to unify the 
user descriptor conversion functions... someday I'll get to it again.
Zach
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |