 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own threa
| To: | "John D. Ramsdell" <ramsdell@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread. |
| From: | "Jacob Gorm Hansen" <jacobg@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:03:22 +0200 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:53:27 -0700 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=qm9DoCoYCfL7rWVWdAR9+/VEvUbkZCUJarAg0bwUwZGBuMPw1qMgEzi0TAeedE0iuAfgILedF24EkAgjtoSUhtozR2zn0/T6YzvlLfg7pkbY7IDUdln9JUh/FUoLFNOvc6iiPVV1p7hFugr8laa//iCiYu7Plw8ZDt9g35LPmLw= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <ogtd5djhp1h.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <E1FmGLS-000627-SM@host-192-168-0-1-bcn-london> <ogtd5djhp1h.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 08 Jun 2006 07:20:26 -0400, John D. Ramsdell <ramsdell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Some Xen developers have questioned why one would ever need to run a Mini-OS application before thread scheduling is enabled. I can see no reason to do it. If no one else can, I suggest each an application be a thread function that is started in kernel.c. I can, when writing a boot-loader there is no need for multiple threads, so I would like the option of not having to start (and clean up after) any. Perhaps the last part of start_kernel() could be moved to a weak function, that people like me can override? Regards, Jacob _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread., John D. Ramsdell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread., John D. Ramsdell |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread., John D. Ramsdell |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread., John D. Ramsdell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
