|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Why is 'emulate' as good as writable PT's?
 
We have been doing some scalability work, and we noticed that forcing 
'emulate' in arch.x86/mm.c achieves the same performance on 1-way dom0.  
For example:
xen-unstable, changeset 10200, i386 with PAE, 1-way
benchmark       xen0   xen0+emulate
-------------   ----   ----
reaim_fserver   4421   4426
reaim_compute   2555   2531
SDET            4759   4810
 The reaim benchmarks probably don't have much fork(), where I'd expect 
writable page tables to help, but SDET has a ton of fork+exec.
 Could there be situations were we are inadvertently triggering a 
writable page table, where we should just be doing a update_va_mapping()?
-Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |