 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Q: XENMEM_maximum_reservation
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Q: XENMEM_maximum_reservation |
| From: | Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 May 2006 08:07:22 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 25 May 2006 05:07:47 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
AFAICT, XENMEM_current_reservation and XENMEM_maximum_reservation are
not used by Linux.
However, if they were do we have to pass the domid_t as a pointer?
could we not pass it by value?
file: xen/common/memory.c: 369
Rather than
if ( copy_from_guest(&domid, arg, 1) )
how about:
domid = (domid_t)arg;
thoughts?
-JX
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [XM-TEST] block device write verify test 3rd attempt, Harry Butterworth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: crash with Xen dom0 image from kdump, Akio Takebe |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [XM-TEST] block device write verify test 3rd attempt, Harry Butterworth |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [NET] front: Replace backend_state with netif_carrier, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
