WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] VT/ioemu: vga memory access?

To: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxx>, "Xen devel list" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] VT/ioemu: vga memory access?
From: "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:26:12 +0200
Delivery-date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:40:41 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZ4+jsV6r8EVzgpTJKoso9G4xGXXwAAYBQQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] VT/ioemu: vga memory access?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Gerd Hoffmann
> Sent: 16 May 2006 15:44
> To: Xen devel list
> Subject: [Xen-devel] VT/ioemu: vga memory access?
> 
>   Hi,
> 
> How is vga vram access handled in the device model?  Is there 
> some kind of notification system, by mapping those pages 
> read-only, then trap and forward any write access to qemu-dm?

Actually, xen HVM handles all memory mapped IO in the same way - pages are not 
present, causing a page-fault and then checking the address against a "memory 
mapped IO range" in the function mmio_space() [I haven't looked inside this 
function], and if it's a match it's passed to QEMU via handle_mmio(). 

Note also that if paging isn't enabled (real-mode or some other similar 
situation), any page-fault is unconditonally dealt with by calling 
handle_mmio() without checking if it's a MMIO address - because nothing else 
should give a page-fault in non-paging mode.

> 
> I'm seeing obscure crashes in vga text mode, looks like they 
> are triggered by a memmove in vga vram, at least this is what 
> xenctx prints me:
> 
> 
> master-xen root /vm/hvm# /usr/lib/xen/bin/xenctx 35
> eip: c01a59a9
> esp: cf2dbe58
> eax: c00b99a0   ebx: c00b99a0   ecx: fffff661   edx: c00b9860
> esi: c00b8ec0   edi: c00b9000   ebp: c1207000
>  cs: 00000060    ds: 0000007b    fs: 00000000    gs: 00000033
> 
> Stack:
> failed to map PT
> failed to map page.
> 
> 
> EIP c01a59a9 points into memmove (linux kernel):
> 
> c01a5990 <memmove>:
> c01a5990:       57                      push   %edi
> c01a5991:       39 d0                   cmp    %edx,%eax
> c01a5993:       56                      push   %esi
> c01a5994:       53                      push   %ebx
> c01a5995:       89 c3                   mov    %eax,%ebx
> c01a5997:       73 07                   jae    c01a59a0 <memmove+0x10>
> c01a5999:       e8 ca ff ff ff          call   c01a5968 <memcpy>
> c01a599e:       eb 0c                   jmp    c01a59ac <memmove+0x1c>
> c01a59a0:       8d 74 0a ff             lea 
> 0xffffffff(%edx,%ecx,1),%esi
> c01a59a4:       8d 7c 08 ff             lea 
> 0xffffffff(%eax,%ecx,1),%edi
> c01a59a8:       fd                      std
> c01a59a9:       f3 a4                   repz movsb 
> %ds:(%esi),%es:(%edi)
>                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ here
> c01a59ab:       fc                      cld
> c01a59ac:       89 d8                   mov    %ebx,%eax
> c01a59ae:       5b                      pop    %ebx
> c01a59af:       5e                      pop    %esi
> c01a59b0:       5f                      pop    %edi
> c01a59b1:       c3                      ret
> 
> 
> Note that the edi register points to a page boundary and ecx 
> looks bogous.  Also note that "xm unpause", then xenctx again 
> prints the very same register dump, feels like someone 
> handling a fault incorrectly, leading to the very same fault 
> instantly ...
> 
> Idea anyone what this might be?

It looks like the length for memmove has been calculated incorrectly (negative 
number), and that would move aroung 4GB of memory. 

I can't really explain why b9000 shouldn't be a valid VGA memory page tho'. 
Perhaps it's because the mode of graphics you're in, and that doesn't allow 
more than 4KB of display memory - I'm surprised about that tho'. 

So it's weird that it's haning there... 

--
Mats 
> 
> cheers,
> 
>   Gerd
> 
> 
> --
> Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
> Erst mal heiraten, ein, zwei Kinder, und wenn alles läuft 
> geh' ich nach drei Jahren mit der Familie an die Börse.
> http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/julika-dora.jpeg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel