WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: Question about pirq_guest_unmask

To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: Question about pirq_guest_unmask
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:19:23 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:23:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD8094E7BA2@pdsmsx403>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD8094E7BA2@pdsmsx403>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 27 Apr 2006, at 13:16, Tian, Kevin wrote:

If that's the case, it's possible for one EOI issued early than
expected.
Does I miss anything important? Is it OK to change it to service desired

pirq only?

Yes, that needs doing. Pick a new physdevop number though. If we backport the patch to 3.0.2 then we'll need to keep the old scan-all physdevop as a fallback and for backward compatibility.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>