|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Regarding page table management changes from Xen v1to Xe
> > On 64b we could use the 1:1 mapping of all physmem that Xen has.
> > Obviously that is infeasible on 32b. In fact the interface
> (passing a
> > virtual address) pretty much means we have to use a linear
> mapping in
> > both cases.
>
> Couldn't we temporarily map the page table page? Not that we
> would actually want to do that. Just trying to confirm my understand.
Sure, but that's expensive on 32b as map_domain_mem has to do real work
(it's cheap on 64b as we have a 1-to-1 map of machine memory).
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Regarding page table management changes from Xen v1to Xen v2 (and v3),
Ian Pratt <=
|
|
|
|
|