| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Hypercall number assignment convension (was Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:10:36AM +0900, Akio Takebe wrote:
> Can kexec hypecll use Hypercall 11 or 30?
> I think using not hypercall but dom0_op is good idea
> because using kexec is rare. :-)
I think Rusty's xen share also had a similar problem caused by
the hypercall number conflict.
Xen/ia64 with virtual physical model also needs a hypercall number
for its own use.
Currently it large enough (=256) that it is unlikly to be used by xen/x86.
Is there any convension about how to take hypercall number?
At least hypercall numbers for arch-specific purpose and
experimental purpose should be defined.
--
yamahata
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home