 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] assign_irq_vector adjustments
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] assign_irq_vector adjustments |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:59:27 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:59:24 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In both i386 and x86-64 Linux, using a static variable (and thus having the potential of missing synchronization there, as I suspect exists in native Linux) is not needed with the hypercall approach. In the hypervisor, the patch adds the needed synchronization. Jan
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH][Mini-OS] cscope patch, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][Mini-OS] cscope patch, Anthony Liguori |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH][Mini-OS] cscope patch, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] assign_irq_vector adjustments, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
