WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Does dom0 see all physical processors? (RE: [Xen-ia64-de

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Does dom0 see all physical processors? (RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SAL INFO virtualization)
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:40:34 +0800
Cc: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:41:36 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZXuYRZBCMKWch8TC+9R8YpGU2bqwAAL58g
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Does dom0 see all physical processors? (RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SAL INFO virtualization)
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年4月4日 15:26
>
>
>On 4 Apr 2006, at 03:17, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>
>>
>> Then consider your question about a large box with many processors.
>> How about the real environment? Is it the case to provide a 16-way
>SMP
>> box, or a 16-way NUMA box? I prefer to the latter. If it's a NUMA box,
>> dom0 sees physical ACPI table and can be configured as NUMA
>aware.
>
>This is a model we must support if we are to have domain0 handle other
>processor-related ACPI activities (e.g., power management). The power
>information and available settings won't make much sense to the user
>unless there's an equivalence between VCPUs and PCPUs for domain0.
>
>  -- Keir

Yes, and thanks for making it clearer. (Originally I only came up
performance reason for this model.)

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>