|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] This patch fixes several issues related to vmxas
>Can you explain what was wrong with the function this patch changes,
>and how the patch fixes that problem? The patch looks kludgy to me (as
>far as I understand) -- apparently trying to differentiate between
>real-mode and protected-mode segments? Why is that needed? Shouldn't
>you be looking at the execution mode of the caller (e.g., EFLAGS.VM)?
>
> -- Keir
Changeset 9366 from Leendert is to support big real mode, in turn to
support the SYSLINUX/ISOLINUX.
so the address calculation is kludgy, the point here is to identify if a
cpu is in big real mode, if so, we should use protected mode addressing
even in real mode.
-Xin
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|