Re: [Xen-devel] Assertion '! IS_INVALID_M2P_ENTRY(gpfn)' failed

* Nakajima, Jun (jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
> > I've triggered this a few times now, so time to report. 
> > Unfortuantely, I 
> > don't have a good recipe for reproducing this one, and this is a
> > reasonably 
> > hacked up branch of (domU) XenLinux.  So, while I can't discount bugs
> > in this domU, a domU bug shouldn't crash Xen like this:
> 
> Are you doing live migration? In the default setup for domUs, the shadow
> code is never used.

As Keir mentioned, this is simplified domU that's shadow mode only.
I've applied Christian's changes, we'll see how that goes.

thanks,
-chris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [Xen-devel] Assertion '! IS_INVALID_M2P_ENTRY(gpfn)' failed killsmachine, Nakajima, Jun Re: [Xen-devel] Assertion '! IS_INVALID_M2P_ENTRY(gpfn)' failed killsmachine, Keir Fraser Re: [Xen-devel] Assertion '! IS_INVALID_M2P_ENTRY(gpfn)' failed killsmachine, Chris Wright <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] build in SATA drivers to the -xen kernel for x86_64, Keir Fraser

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Various build clean-ups, Chris Wright

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Assertion '! IS_INVALID_M2P_ENTRY(gpfn)' failed killsmachine, Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] Assertion '! IS_INVALID_M2P_ENTRY(gpfn)' failedkillsmachine, Nakajima, Jun

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]