|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.
To: |
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver. |
From: |
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:54:44 +0000 |
Cc: |
Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:44:04 +0000 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<44217DBD.8030201@xxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Mail-followup-to: |
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
References: |
<20060322063040.960068000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060322063809.005748000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44217DBD.8030201@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:39:25AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This is another thing that has always put me off. The virtual block
> device driver has the ability to masquerade as other types of block
> devices. It actually claims to be an IDE or SCSI device allocating the
> appropriate major/minor numbers.
>
> This seems to be pretty evil and creating interesting failure conditions
> for users who load IDE or SCSI modules. I've seen it trip up a number
> of people in the past. I think we should only ever use the major number
> that was actually allocated to us.
Exactly. We vetoed crap like that in the ibm vio drivers already so
it was removed before merging those drivers.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|