WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: softirq bound to cpus


On 15 Mar 2006, at 20:23, Tim Freeman wrote:

Looking more closely there does not seem to be a ksoftirqd equivalent: in entry.S, test_all_events is jumped to often via ret_from_intr. So it looks like the pending softirq requests are handled quite often and block until they are done. So I'm guessing the quote from the book does not apply so much (and these
deferrable functions in Xen need to be quite fast).

They occur fairly often, they are short in duration, and they often need to be executed on a particular CPU (that's true of the schedule and timer softirqs at least). Performance-wise, CPU affinity should win over any small resulting load imbalance.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>