|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: softirq bound to cpus
On 15 Mar 2006, at 20:23, Tim Freeman wrote:
Looking more closely there does not seem to be a ksoftirqd equivalent:
in
entry.S, test_all_events is jumped to often via ret_from_intr. So it
looks like
the pending softirq requests are handled quite often and block until
they are
done. So I'm guessing the quote from the book does not apply so much
(and these
deferrable functions in Xen need to be quite fast).
They occur fairly often, they are short in duration, and they often
need to be executed on a particular CPU (that's true of the schedule
and timer softirqs at least). Performance-wise, CPU affinity should win
over any small resulting load imbalance.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|