Sorry Ewan if there was any mis-communications, the patch is fine. I was
probing for greater understanding. Thanks.
wm
==============
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 07:14 -0800, Daniel Stekloff wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:58 +0000, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:27:59PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >
> > > This is a repost of a previously posted patch to test suspend and resume
> > > cycles of the TPM front- and backend.
> > > Now that sysfs is mounted in the RAM disk of the test environment, the
> > > test code does not need to do this anymore. This patch also simplifies
> > > previous tests and the APIs used there.
> >
> > Woody Marvel and Dan Stekloff still seem to be discussing the best way to
> > detect sysfs capabilities. I presume your patch depends upon Dan's, and
> > I've
> > been holding that off until I get a sysfs-detection patch that everyone's
> > happy with.
>
>
> Hi Ewan,
>
> Please put the sysfs patch in as is, Woody is fine with it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home