WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: Linux PG_arch_1 conflict

from [Keir Fraser] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: Linux PG_arch_1 conflict
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:31:51 +0000
Cc: xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:34:34 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD59FF3C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD59FF3C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

On 10 Mar 2006, at 21:11, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:


That thread seems to already have a solution. Has anybody run it past
Linux MM people? (Adding xen-devel to CC for greater exposure.)


If by "solution" you mean that Keir could change Xenlinux to
add a new "PG_foreign" bit and change Xenlinux/x86 (and netback)
to use that bit rather than PG_arch_1, I agree.

Comments, Keir (or others)?
Sounds like the proper fix. I'll leave it to Christian and others involved in the Linux upstreaming effort to have the final word. 

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [XenPPC] Re: IRQs delivery., Olof Johansson
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread:  [Xen-devel] RE: Linux PG_arch_1 conflict, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
Next by Thread:  [Xen-devel] RE: Linux PG_arch_1 conflict, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy