Re: [Xen-devel] Most recent Kernel version supported

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

http://lists.xen.org/

To:

Elizeu Santos-Neto <elizeu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject:

Re: [Xen-devel] Most recent Kernel version supported

From:

Mathieu Ropert <mro@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:15:15 +0100

Cc:

xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Delivery-date:

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:30:02 +0000

Envelope-to:

www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In-reply-to:

<1141864217.7784.111.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

List-help:

<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>

List-id:

Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

List-post:

<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>

List-subscribe:

<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe:

<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>

References:

<1141864217.7784.111.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sender:

xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

User-agent:

Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013)

Hi,

i'm running Xen unstable on 2.6.16-rc5 without any problem. Didn't need any

tuning to make it work (except adding my SATA controller support in thekernel config).


Regards,

Mathieu


Elizeu Santos-Neto wrote:

        Hi all,

        Does anyone know what is the most recent version of the kernel that can
be smoothly patched by Xen? I was wondering if the latest stable
(2.6.16.5) could be used.

        I have found some previous posts about 2.6.12 vs. 2.6.13.

        Is there any new information on this?

        Thanks in advance,
        ./Eli


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] is anyone working on bug 195 (time running backwards messages), Hans-Christian Armingeon

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] is anyone working on bug 195 (time running backwards messages), Keir Fraser

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Most recent Kernel version supported, Elizeu Santos-Neto

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xc_core.c - Fix order of evaluation issue in xc_domain_dumpcore, Ben Thomas

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]