|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec
> Actually a clear-trap-table call is quite easy to add: I checked in a
> patch that will clear the entire trap table if you pass a NULL pointer
> to the set_trap_table hypercall. With that patch in place, if you take a
> fault you will get a register dump in Xen as desired.
Well, I've tried that now, and got this:
(XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (ff147f35)
(XEN) Domain 1 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#1:
(XEN) Assertion '(diff != 0) || VM86_MODE(regs) || !RING_0(regs) ||
HVM_DOMAIN(current)' failed, line 35, file x86_32/traps.c
(XEN) BUG at x86_32/traps.c:35
(changeset 9137)
cheers,
Gerd
--
Gerd 'just married' Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
I'm the hacker formerly known as Gerd Knorr.
http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/just-married.jpeg
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Michael Vrable
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec,
Gerd Hoffmann <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Gerd Hoffmann
|
|
|
|
|