|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting
On 22 Feb 2006, at 23:58, Dan Hecht wrote:
To solve this, it may be best to have the hypervisor interface expose
per-vcpu stolen time directly, rather than vcpu_time. Then the guest
does not need to try to guess whether to charge (system_time -
vcpu_time) against idle or steal.
Yes, the distinction between stolen and available time does makes sense
(although I'm not sure 'available' is a great name) otherwise you can't
account for wakeup latencies. account_steal_time() would need to be
modified in Linux, though, as we would not need its dodgy heuristic for
deciding whether to account to stolen time or iowait/idle.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|