Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64 problem with invalid page fau

Hi,

On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 10:01 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I had already pointed out to Christian that there are a couple of pieces 
> missing from the 2.6.16-rc? merges (along with
> the actual patches that we use for SLES10). The patch you provide here isn't 
> sufficient, however - the area that
> spurious page faults need to be dealt with is the entire kernel range 
> (otherwise e.g. memory hotplug code, which
> hopefully is or will be used for increasing a VMs memory, may trigger the 
> same problem). Jan

OK, thanks: that makes sense.

I notice "Fix upgrade omissions." in today's xen-unstable.hg logs; I
assume that that contains the other bits you referred to?

Cheers,
 Stephen



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64 problem with invalid page fault in linux 2.6.16-rc1, Stephen C. Tweedie [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64 problem with invalid page fault in linux 2.6.16-rc1, Jan Beulich Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64 problem with invalid page fault in linux 2.6.16-rc1, Stephen C. Tweedie <=

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow building with perfc and perfc_arrays, Ben Thomas

Next by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] bad type error in get_page_type() line 1525, King, Steven R

Previous by Thread:

[PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64 problem with invalid page fault in linux 2.6.16-rc1, Jan Beulich

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] changeset 8831 gets sockets, cores, and siblings wrong, Andrew Theurer

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]