|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] open/stat64 syscalls run faster on Xen VM than standard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Anthony Liguori
> Sent: 28 November 2005 14:39
> To: xuehai zhang
> Cc: Xen Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] open/stat64 syscalls run faster on
> Xen VM than standard Linux
>
> This may just be the difference between having the extra
> level of block caching from using a loop back device.
>
> Try running the same benchmark on a domain that uses an
> actual partition. While the syscalls may appear to be
> faster, I imagine it's because the cost of pulling in a block
> has already been payed so the overall workload is unaffected.
And this would be the same as running standard linux with the loopback
file-system mounted and chroot to the local file-system, or would that
be different? [I'm asking because I don't actually understand enough
about how it works to know what difference it makes, and I would like to
know, because at some point I'll probably need to know this.]
--
Mats
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
> xuehai zhang wrote:
[snip]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|