WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] open/stat64 syscalls run faster on Xen VM than standard

To: "Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xuehai zhang" <hai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] open/stat64 syscalls run faster on Xen VM than standard Linux
From: "Petersson, Mats" <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:45:12 +0100
Cc: Xen Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:46:07 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcX0Kbbn9W5ICdxbRtiHbRPDv5zGCwAAEQmA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] open/stat64 syscalls run faster on Xen VM than standard Linux
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Anthony Liguori
> Sent: 28 November 2005 14:39
> To: xuehai zhang
> Cc: Xen Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] open/stat64 syscalls run faster on 
> Xen VM than standard Linux
> 
> This may just be the difference between having the extra 
> level of block caching from using a loop back device.
> 
> Try running the same benchmark on a domain that uses an 
> actual partition.  While the syscalls may appear to be 
> faster, I imagine it's because the cost of pulling in a block 
> has already been payed so the overall workload is unaffected.

And this would be the same as running standard linux with the loopback
file-system mounted and chroot to the local file-system, or would that
be different? [I'm asking because I don't actually understand enough
about how it works to know what difference it makes, and I would like to
know, because at some point I'll probably need to know this.]

--
Mats
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 
> xuehai zhang wrote:
[snip]


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel