Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Daily Xen Builds

[Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:01:08PM -0000, Ian Pratt wrote:

>  
> > >             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> > > ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
> > >               FC3pae |   73 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> > > hs20.1.rhel4-x86_32pae |   73 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> > >  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   70 |   23 |     1 |     0 |
> > >  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   71 |   22 |     1 |     0 |
> > >      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   70 |   23 |     1 |     0 |
> > >      x235sles9nonpae |   73 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> > >           x305rh4pae |   72 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> > >      x305sles9nonpae |   72 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> > >           x335fc4pae |   85 |    8 |     1 |     0 |
> > >     x335sles9_pae4gb |   73 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> > >  x460.fc3-x86_64-8gb |   67 |   26 |     0 |     1 |
> > 
> > Wow, this is a pretty major regression somewhere.  We were 
> > down at about 8 fails per platform (some with much less) a week ago.  
> > 
> > http://xmtest.dague.org/ shows the fail rate on a steady 
> > upward climb, which is not the direction we should be heading 
> > right now.
> 
> Sean,
> 
> I think this is actually your bug :-)
> 
> The changes to xm-test you posted on Friday seem to have broken the
> initrd such that the guest can't mount /proc, which seems to account for
> the failures.

Specifically, they're Dan Smith's changes.  Changeset
7878:ab845d97de72813985aa5ee1af4730a088c1d3e0 has stopped us from using old
initrd's, and new ones built from the tree fail trying to find "run-parts".

Ewan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel