 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] simple check for domU?
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] simple check for domU? |
| From: | Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:21:00 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:21:06 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OgsfvHfMELmpqWzdaPyPT6e98L3eZSN3lyvYGOFKNY0I5FS8R5eRqATHIy1iKZcJEZ0BZamArxDUmcTk4EttFnz0xU0fWmdrUWnCwAUx4b42fv6KczTI5tlCs8ckYxS/b8M8gV1S8v4MG4E+gFl3yRZC+SiSLNokh8wjI7ux69s= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20051111015228.GC3558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <623652d50511101623q533a8e04r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051111015228.GC3558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 11/11/05, Karsten M. Self <kself@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > on Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:23:18AM +0000, Chris Bainbridge > (chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Hi, is there a simple way to check that we're running under a domU? So > > far I came up with: > > Try: > > uname -r | grep -q -- -xen > > ... which generally works. 'test -d /proc/xen' is pretty reliable as > well. I'm looking specifically for domU and not dom0 (well, it would be useful to have a reliable way of identifying both). /proc/xen will be present in dom0 and uname depends on the kernel EXTRAVERSION which isn't guaranteed. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Backend device in use after reboot, Mark Williamson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH][XM-TEST] Prevent 'make clean' from removing downloaded sources, Dan Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] simple check for domU?, Karsten M. Self |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] simple check for domU?, NAHieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
