 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: bad ip checksums
| To: | Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: bad ip checksums |
| From: | Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Oct 2005 16:54:18 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:52:14 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KL2Qz1kwYB63GSVMugXdGZbj+UrVGvJa06OczoF/Gq+TtrBOdpZML2Jm9Tvhdw0FPzFUOsv1cuFMLIL9MPbcy5/e+gsi3vWjih2qcEhK5LfzYRQcRfyVVTKJm1KNMmNT3UWS/Mn1yuxgE1Sz9A3faR1A0aYC5+HFWrqiKHvJ9MY= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E1D0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E1D0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 06/10/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > My old 20050929 snapshot works ok. The .config files are identical. > > > Kernel config attached. Any ideas on what broke? > > > > Last nights binary release doesn't have this problem. Is the > > config file available? > > linux-2.6-sparse/arch/xen/configs Using that config, with 7234. I built a dom0 kernel and the problem is still present. Weird. What gcc and binutils are you using? I've got gcc 3.4.4 and binutils-2.15.92.0.2. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] network & block device setup via udev, Gerd Knorr |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] @introduceDomain with xenbus?, NAHieu |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] Re: bad ip checksums, Ian Pratt |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] Re: bad ip checksums, Ian Pratt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
