|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch? 
| Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:51 +0100, Christian Limpach wrote:
>>On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 04:36:11PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>Before I reply to the rest of your comments, I'd like to point out that
>>I don't agree with your assumption that we can delay suspend/resume
>>until we're outside of a transaction.  This seems to be the fundamental
>>difference driving different solutions.
> 
> Absolutely.  The delays will be immeasurably short.
What about denial of service (intentional or due to bugs in guest OSes/tools)?
-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Rusty Russell
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?,
David Hopwood <=
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Rusty Russell
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, harry
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Rusty Russell
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Rusty Russell
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Andrew Warfield
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Rusty Russell
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?, Rusty Russell
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |