WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] gcc version

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] gcc version
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:55:44 +1000
Cc: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:53:27 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXBvswKPKrLRgDhQw+QOtTiQz/daQAADI0g
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] gcc version
> gcc 4.0.0 has worked for me, except for some non-fatal crashes in the
> proc filesystem during boot (these crashes aren't xen-specific). I
> haven't tried 4.0.1.
> 
> In general, unless you want to fix bugs you are better off with gcc
> 3.2.x, 3.3.x or 3.4.x.

I tried 3.3 and 3.4 (I seem to have those installed in addition to
4.0.1... go figure!) too. 3.4 did the same thing (perpetual reboot), and
3.3 hung on reboot. I'm remote from the machine so I'll have to wait
until I drop by the office to take a look.

So I guess it isn't the gcc version after all. I wonder what else I'm
doing wrong...

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>