On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:36 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2005, at 03:07, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > Exactly! So you would have me implement multiplexing code in the
> > kernel, demultiplexing code in the daemon, checking code in the kernel
> > to make sure we don't corrupt the shared comms channel, for no reason.
>
> Better to implement simple mux/demux code than pain-in-the-arse
> save/restore code.
But but but... it doesn't *help*. That's the entire point!
OK, please describe, in simple terms, why you think save/restore is
different if we multiplex across a single transport?
Rusty.
--
A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home