WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] hg 0.7 released

from [Kip Macy] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] hg 0.7 released
From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:32:33 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mercurial@xxxxxxxxxxx, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 01:30:15 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IvXLbyVZD00QybXj4z6Gi5XDKrwyVhyJ8ARhAPkY4n/ra1NXvBJE7nmB2fSn7kixgsGHVwwOHk4+0QI8O5WkV39lyfsvx+TJXi47sc9QEtYrXjVNLfrqHWxaoWvgqL703PHYvbetd4mVjf8Q/K4NUyWCDsSpYYoxRRF2HAYFs8M=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050921012746.GB21777@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200509161628.35324.hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx> <b1fa29170509201807329d3156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050921011435.GA21777@xxxxxxxxx> <b1fa2917050920181915a246f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050921012746.GB21777@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ahh - OK. It was just by chance that it failed the two times I used 0.7 and didn't fail when I used 0.6b.

                    -Kip

On 9/20/05, Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:19:57PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote:
> Hmm -
> What are you doing differently in 0.7 that is causing the server to use more
> memory?

Nothing. Cloning a repo from scratch sends exactly the same command to the
server in all versions ("send all changesets starting at the history root").

I think you've just got more load on xenbits.

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] hg 0.7 released, Kip Macy
Next by Date:  [Xen-devel] Can we turn on ACPI in vmxloader by default?, Yu, Ke
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] hg 0.7 released, Matt Mackall
Next by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] hg 0.7 released, James Bulpin
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy