RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Cleaning up /proc/xen

To:	"Steven Hand" <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Cleaning up /proc/xen
From:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:28:51 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 08 Sep 2005 09:26:48 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcW0ICzYCNcWlOjbRG6+QAMLVB/nIAANzsxQ
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [RFC] Cleaning up /proc/xen

 
> >Is this going to make having udev a requirement? (or would we also 
> >mknod some entries in de as part of an install?)
> >
> >I guess most distros have had udev for a while.
> 
> Yes - though it'd be good to fix udev start (which takes 
> ages, at least on redhat root filesystems). 

Yep, I'd buy a beer for whoever fixed that...
 
Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Change references to /dev/xen/evtchn to /dev/evtchn, Keir Fraser

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH][VT] fix bug that service os&vmx guest can't communicate with each other., Edwin Zhai

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Cleaning up /proc/xen, Vincent Hanquez

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Cleaning up /proc/xen, Andrew Theurer

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Cleaning up /proc/xen