WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] VMX Hardware

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] VMX Hardware
From: Mogens Valentin <monz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:23:27 +0200
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Goetz Bock <bock@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:22:06 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <8813001a9664f4ada850cb1ff23dd564@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Mr Dev
References: <20050814104441.GJ8146@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8813001a9664f4ada850cb1ff23dd564@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: monz@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1
Keir Fraser wrote:

On 14 Aug 2005, at 11:44, Goetz Bock wrote:

As the VMX hardware is supposed to be out "soon" I actually wanted to
wait for it to hit the shelvs first.

Looks like I can not do this. so I've a question for the informed.

What hardware should I get now, and still be able to upgrade to VMX when
it's available? If possible only by getting a new CPU.


Buying a mainboard with LGA775 socket is probably a fairly safe bet, but there's no guarantee that future processor generations will run on it even if the socket doesn't change. Compatibility might depend on the manufacturer creating appropriate BIOS patches, for example.

Looking at Intels latest 'upgrade' path, which shows we'll often have to buy new HW for new cpu's, I'd go for AMD. Seems they're into the game of longtime support, so my bet is that you'll be able to outfit quite a lot of the latest mobos with future AMD64 cpu's. This has of late been the case with i.e. their X2 line. Most resent mobos can handle those with a BIOS upgrade.
I'd be looking at Iwill, Tyan, Gigabye.

I assume by VMX, you're talking about cpu/hardware with HW-support for virtualisation, i.e. Intels Vanderbilt Technology (VT) and AMD' Pacifica. If so, it's clear to me that AMD will be leading, because of it's onchip memory controller, and hence reduced needs for software support to do the page switching, for which Intel needs quite a lot of software to emulate.

However, I'm not sufficiently familiar with Xen on this topic (just getting started). What I've read is that Xen won't benefit from or even use those HW-enabled mechanisms. Someone pls. correct me if I'm wrong here - I'd very much like to be wrong. Would be a pity not to take advantage of such mechanisms, IMHO.

--
Kind regards,
Mogens Valentin


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>