 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] mtu on vifX.X
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] mtu on vifX.X |
| From: | Adam Heath <doogie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:58:23 -0500 (CDT) |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:36:42 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Is there an reason why this is limited to 1500 bytes? Could it be increased? Or, could the ioctl be implemented so it could be changed from the cmdline? It'd help with performance between dom0 and domU. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/hostinfo ?, aq |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-tools] [PATCH] rework xen/xm/main.py to be more straight forward, Sean Dague |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/hostinfo ?, aq |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] mtu on vifX.X, Stefan Berger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
