WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Haddrive Performance

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Haddrive Performance
From: Marcus Hardt <marcus.hardt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:31:17 +0200
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:30:00 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7.2
Hi there,

I've ran some simple 'dd' read performance tests on xen-2.0.6-stable, finding 
quite different results between image backed domains and partition backed 
domains. The Image backed domains are slightly faster than the partion backed 
ones.

Also I not, that for more than two domains, running dd in parallel, the 
performance (especially of the image backed domains) drops dramatically below 
values I've measured using xen-2.0.5-stable.

Are you aware of this? Will it be resolved?

Cheers,
-- 
Marcus

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>