xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] makefile regression in 5625?

from [Scott Parish]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xense-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-devel] makefile regression in 5625?
From:	"Scott Parish" <srparish@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2005 01:35:27 +0000
Delivery-date:	Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:39:39 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2005 01:42:40 +0000
Resent-from:	srp@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id:	<200507080240.j682epwe027044@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i

I'm using a crosstools cross compiler, so i can't and don't want to build
the whole source tree. I used to be able to generate the two files i was
interested in (xen.gz and vmlinuz) by doing:

  cd xen
  make XEN_TARGET_ARCH=x86_64 CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu- && cp 
xen.gz /tftpboot
  cd ..
  make XEN_TARGET_ARCH=x86_64 CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu- linux26

With changeset 5625, doing "make linux26" seems to be building the whole
source tree. I'd include a patch, but the comments for 5625 don't give
me a good enough idea why the change was made, so i'd be tempted to just
revert.

sRp

-- 
Scott Parish
Signed-off-by: srparish@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] makefile regression in 5625?, Scott Parish <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted, Chris Wright
Next by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted, Li, Xin B
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Use hypercalls instead of accessing debug registers directly., Ian Pratt
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove NX bit from x86-64 pages, Jerone Young
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]