RE: [Xen-devel] Some stability regression in domU in the latest

To:	<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] Some stability regression in domU in the latest hg?
From:	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:06:09 -0700
Delivery-date:	Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:05:00 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcWBlc5RLeb0DiqDRzmQblRf9EFPKwABn0UA
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Some stability regression in domU in the latest hg?

Never mind. I think the problem is memory shortage. I used to give at
least 256MB to domU, and gave 128MB below. If I revert that to give
256MB, the problem is gone now.


Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> I tried the latest tree running x86_64 domU, and I see some stability
> regression. For example, kernel build causes a soft hang; If I do
> Ctr-C, it gets out of the hang. I haven't seen this kind of problem
> before, and I believe this is a new issue. This can be in the 32-bit
> side as well. Can someone check 32-bit domU?
> 
> Jun

Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Some stability regression in domU in the latest hg?, Nakajima, Jun RE: [Xen-devel] Some stability regression in domU in the latest hg?, Nakajima, Jun <=

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Some stability regression in domU in the latest hg?