 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm info
| To: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm info |
| From: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:30:46 +0900 |
| Cc: | xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:29:34 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l8p1L1wcVsVPayzQ+Xy6+nzci0UOHuvfKvruby9ZNW+FJKDC0YU3MUCy+V21pOfqB61FO4Tp786U0z8P/kq9e3d0FCkKzydGlu29L7quzoAiua05dFSPu+NhzBO0dN3tJjP0kg5xRVv5nCP34Vzr8I+rzMoQ0DZurHd+HcGknjo= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <beffde07d3317cff5686f10a29aefd15@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <9cde8bff050703001311e0e36b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <c3157a566ff5ee8b4ce9c1ee0093cfe6@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <9cde8bff05070301352470b3f9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cff5d25b83287c1dd5a5a166fb513e62@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <9cde8bff05070301493e141ab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <beffde07d3317cff5686f10a29aefd15@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 7/3/05, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 3 Jul 2005, at 09:49, aq wrote: > > >> Yes: that's the only change you made in the file, except for a > >> one-line > >> change for xen_extraversion_t. > > > > i always think that code inside a switch() should be indented. that is > > a standard coding style, no? > > The code is indented, of course, as it is already -- but neither Xen > nor Linux indent the braces enclosing switch or case statements, and > then indent the code one tab more. ok, so please unindent that part. regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] movl issue, Vincent Hanquez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Running and 386 emulator on Xen, Mark Williamson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm info, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm info, Ian Pratt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
