 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS?
| To: | Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS? |
| From: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:31:57 +0900 |
| Cc: | Paul Larson <plars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:31:02 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ub5AVF2i68ANabjvxX8OpwDloQ7RvTHpQe8aBUAQq5SofaDfE9Q7s3VVAOu3+6ndLlmYbwz/7349LJjPijifhKZFVE06+/9XZGo33dwyWMFfgj6lQGg/t+JxbBEp82nOA/OkJIhb5h8Fbo93HcXNewu/ehSUqWzDa9tsY4TS+no= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42AF36D3.408@xxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506141327260.1760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506141508200.25723@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1118777205.2404.282.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailman.1118777276.15947@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42AF3354.80603@xxxxxxxxx> <1118778631.2404.288.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42AF36D3.408@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 6/15/05, Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Paul Larson wrote: > > > Interesting, I hadn't seen that one before. I had seen this one though, > > which seems a little more concise to me: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=summary > > Tools are richer in the git space because there are more people looking > at it (compare the traffic on git vs hg). hg is attempting to leverage > some of these by providing command line compatibility for git (called hgit). > > http://www.selenic.com/hg/?cmd=file;filenode=113b5f9c6c1f5f428b2e946374230c46e153a248;file=contrib/hgit > like it or not, it seems there are only 3 reasonable options at the moment: 1. svn (i hate cvs). BK also provides a tool to convert bk repo to cvs repo. 2. git 3. mercurial (while this is promissing and written in python, which many people here can hack it if needed, unfortunately mercurial is the most immatured tool compared to the above two) anyway we must choose one. i vote for svn (do we usually fork the repo? i guess not). mercurial is the second choice to me. regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vmx-mmio-accel.patch, Arun Sharma |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS?, Rusty Russell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS?, Arun Sharma |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS?, Rusty Russell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
