WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fixing iopl and ioperm

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fixing iopl and ioperm
From: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:45:18 -0700
Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 05:44:30 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcVuSL/915G2zc7MQ8GQIAe+eshX2Q==
Thread-topic: [PATCH] Fixing iopl and ioperm
With this patch, x86 and x86-64 share ioport.c, fixing LTP iopl and
ioperm testcase failures (on both). We found an iopl testcase failing
even on x86 xenlinux.

Now x86-64 xenlinux should have the same results regarding the LTP
testcases (as far as we tested).

Signed-off-by: Li B Xin <li.b.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>

Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center 

Attachment: ioport.patch
Description: ioport.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>