|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESUBMIT] don't schedule unplugged vcpus
> > I don't see why we care about vcpus that are down. From the user's
> > point of view they've gone for good -- it just happens that
> Xen hasn't
> > freed the memory in anticipation of it being used again.
> What do you think?
>
> I don't think the users care so much as I want tools to be
> able to extract the current state of affairs for load
> balancing or other operations that want to account for domain state.
I think the vcpu_to_cpu map contains that.
The n_vcpu variable isn't really needed: my inclination would be to just
report the number that are currently up, though I'm not hugely fussed.
Best,
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|