RE: [Xen-devel] stable / unstable parallel install?

To:	"aq" <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] stable / unstable parallel install?
From:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:19:35 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gerd Knorr <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:18:52 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcVmgsj4xcViOWMrR9aUFhhAT475ngABwcwQ
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] stable / unstable parallel install?

> > xcs should not be on the path. Christian pointed out that 
> such helper 
> > applications should probably live in /usr/libexec/xen
> 
> btw, how do you define it "helper application?

Well, users would not want to invoke it directly. It's not useful to
have on the path.

I'd much rather continue to have a single script that's run to start all
the necessary components as per a configuration file, rather than
exposing them all individually to users.

If as Gerd says /usr/libexec/xen is deprecated (though I note that it is
still used by a bunch of stuff in FC3), then what do we go for?
/usr/lib/xen , /usr/share/xen or /usr/opt/xen ?

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] stable / unstable parallel install?