WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree)

To: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree)
From: Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:12:21 +0100
Cc: Xen Dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:11:39 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <9cde8bff050531085334254b42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <9cde8bff050530182342a79827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3d8eece205053106414831da72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9cde8bff050531085334254b42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:53:31AM +0900, aq wrote:
> On 5/31/05, Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 5/31/05, aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This patch (against -unstable ChangeSet@xxxxxx) does the followings:
> > >
> > > - put some configurable variables to xend_config.sxp, and set them to
> > > default values. That will make people aware of their existence, and
> > > let them easily reconfigure xend when needed.
> > 
> > I've not applied this part because we're not sure we're going to keep
> > some of these.
> 
> i see the point, but how about part of this patch in -testing tree
> (see 
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-05/msg01204.html).
> i believe that those options are stable, so if you apply -testing
> patch (this -testing patch got no comment), we should keep the same
> options in this patch, and not reject them all.

I think those are rather obscure options and we don't really want to
encourage people to change them...

    christian


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>