 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] email address fix
| To: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] email address fix |
| From: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 May 2005 18:02:58 +0900 |
| Cc: | katzj@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 25 May 2005 09:02:24 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Yb9eYlPbJkFybzu/G7I8uhqf7BcMFFVDo/7VKr93ggyb49saLVarprvdQLCadG/egqRUyDsp4NEeiDfX5YgJ62uinvBQ9MVAHOfVSEq14wk8oU4uzdYVTTAqYNg1K/UxsLwItDe7Zke/sw/jiqcyEw9037NOsfM8ZmIDB8Q9IhU= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1Daqwq-0005b6-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <9cde8bff050524225725b0ed0d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1Daqwq-0005b6-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 5/25/05, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'll leave it to Jeremy to decide whether he wants to obfuscate his > email address or not. yes, that is better. actually i got this patch by accident: the file was sent to the list twice by Jeremy himself: the first time the email address has xxxx inside, but in the next one (as a patch) that problem was fixed. i got the last patch, and keep in my repository. but then when -unstable merging, the second one is ignored, and the first one was merged instead. when i tried to make patch in the repo against the latest -unstable, i found the problem. hence this patch, and that is why i am sure that the address is correct :-) regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] about vmx_intercept.c, Jiang, Yunhong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] PAE status, Gerd Knorr |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] email address fix, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] email address fix, Jeremy Katz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
