WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] about vmx_intercept.c

To: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] about vmx_intercept.c
From: Miao Feng <miaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:47:12 +0800
Delivery-date: Wed, 25 May 2005 08:41:18 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414
we found something interesting in vmx_intercept.c providing a technique

for high-performance io accessing.

then, what is the use of this technique? for xen-aware? what xen-aware
exactly is?
in terms of VT, we don't have to modify guest os to run on xen 3. if we
are expecting high-performance io, do we have to modify guest os, or
just install some kind of xen-aware (xen-something)?
and, where xen-aware lies? xen space? dom0 space? domU space?

thanx in advance.

anyone? any idea?



-- 
Feng Miao
 
Star SoftComm(China) Ltd
www.starsoftcomm.com
 
Mail: miaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Address: 3rd Floor Xinxi Road,Shangdi,Haidian District, Beijing 100085,PRC


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>