WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 b

To: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index
From: Jerone Young <jerone@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:57:24 -0500
Cc: David F Barrera <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 May 2005 19:56:54 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GECqtltRhwyWSbjHuuiaMcwdXlDQ6V0fRMrYL/prBjMQyQGqA7RGC0bSOady5YgNwNdQ5S1RNfQfwTCkK0nJkoWJdCn/Nerjh72BNimLZEYuXWjyMPxdaG5f736OShF6JOBokLNoi5IeuQjyRtJreF3uqPJifHb9sfZ/zYeoloc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050518195347.GC24549@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1116431940.3626.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050518195347.GC24549@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Jerone Young <jerone@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The fix for this is in bitkeeper now. It did not make it into the
unstable tar ball for the night. So you will not see this problem
tommorow.

On 5/18/05, Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:59:00AM -0500, David F Barrera wrote:
> > Using the May 17 xen-unstable-src.tgz on x86_64, the following error
> > occurs on a SLES 9 SP1 platform (It builds OK on Fedora Core 4, but it
> > does not boot, and that is another issue):
> >
> > gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix 
> > include
> > -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe -I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include
> > -I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -O3 
> > -fomit-frame-pointer
> > -msoft-float -m64 -mno-red-zone -fpic -fno-reorder-blocks
> > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -DNDEBUG -D__ASSEMBLY__ -c x86_64/entry.S -o
> > x86_64/entry.o
> > x86_64/entry.S: Assembler messages:
> > x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index
> > expressionx86_64/entry.S:320: Error: `136+8(%esp)' is not a valid 64 bit
> > base/index expression
> 
> that's odd. could you verify you have the correct line on entry.S ?
> 
> line 317: setnz VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%rax)
> line 320: movw  UREGS_cs+8(%rsp),%ax
> 
> as well, what compiler version are you using ?
> 
> --
> Vincent Hanquez
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel