Re: [Xen-devel] changeset 1.1403 breaks previous xm behaviour

[Steven Hand <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> aq wrote:
> >>(which, among other things, removes the dependence on twisted).
> > 
> > Steven, that means we will remove twisted completely in the (near) future?
> 
> Is twisted *evil*?

Well I wouldn't say that twisted is *evil* but it is somewhat
*twisted* :-) 

> I thought I read something about wanting to get away from it, but is 
> there a particular reason?

Just generally trying to: 

  a) minimize dependencies on any non-standard stuff (one the faqs 
     on the list has to do with twisted), and 
  b) simplify the code so that we can understand it - twisted is 
     overkill for the functionality we require. 

cheers,

S.





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel