RE: [Xen-devel] [rfc] address space reorganization

To:	"Gerd Knorr" <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] [rfc] address space reorganization
From:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:31:16 +0100
Delivery-date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2005 23:31:13 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcVBvIFUCGL4wFpqRb61sOLFtnQbxQAVbf7g
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [rfc] address space reorganization

> This is a patch doing the memory layout changes I've 
> suggested a few days ago on the list.  It's still a static 
> layout, I havn't changed it to adjust the frametable size at 
> runtime.  Doesn't break compatibility, the location of the ro 
> MPT table and the size of xen's private address space is 
> still the same (for non-PAE), so domains don't even notice 
> this change ;)

I think it would be good to introduce a new constant to indicate the
start of the hypervisor protected area rather than using RO_MPT_VIRT_END
everywhere.

Otherwise, I like it.

Best,
Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [rfc] address space reorganization