Re: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?

> [nic@stateless:/usr/src/linux-2.6.11.6] patch -p1 -s  <
> ../xen/xen-2.0.bk/patch-2.6.10-xen0
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
> include/linux/skbuff.h.rej 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> Makefile.rej
>
> >From the looks of include/linux/skbuff.h it should be fine to ignore
>
> skbuff.h.rej.

This may be because one of the Xen support patches has been intergrated into 
the mainline (anyone know if this is the case?).  If so, then it's fine.

> I assume that everything else should be fine.

FYI, the 2.6.11.6 patch applies fine to 2.6.11-xen0 in the 2.0-testing tree 
(ie. the only reject is on the top level makefile).

Cheers,
Mark

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] Is machine_to_phys_mapping a 4MB 'superpage'?, Ian Pratt

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] save/restore problems, Hari Kodungallur

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?, Nicholas Lee

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?, Rik van Riel

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]