|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.
On 31 Mar 2005, at 08:10, Jens Axboe wrote:
Here is a temporary work-around, this should bring you close to 100%
performance at the cost of some extra unplugs. Uncompiled.
Yep, this does the job for me. Thanks! Avoiding the extra unplugs is
harder than it sounds as each request in a batch may go to a different
request queue. To minimise the number of unplugs per batch we'd need to
add code to remember which queues we had used in the current batch,
then kick them at the end of the batch. Is there likely to be any
measurable benefit from reducing the number of unplugs?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Ian Pratt
- [Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance., peter bier
- Re: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Philip R Auld
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Kurt Garloff
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Nivedita Singhvi
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Kurt Garloff
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Nivedita Singhvi
Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|