WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen and virtual iron

To: Sean Harper <harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen and virtual iron
From: Andrew Theurer <habanero@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:57:49 -0600
Cc: "-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:00:27 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <39A29C55BDB6914698687BC15B2D2EAAE6D49D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <39A29C55BDB6914698687BC15B2D2EAAE6D49D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
Sean Harper wrote:

At Linuxworld a company called Virtual Iron is demoing a product that,
like Xen or VMWare, can break physical machines into virtual machines.

However, unlike Xen or VMWare, this product can also aggregate physical
machines into virtual machines.  In other words, it is possible for the
user to specify that 3.5 cpus from 2 machines (2 from 1 and 1.5 from
another) be assigned to a virtual machine. When linux boots on that
virtual machine it simply looks like a 4 cpu machine (but 1 of the cpus
is slower). Presumably there is a pretty big performance penalty for
sharing across machines, which they mitigate to some extent by requiring
Infiniband.

It seems like most of the tricky work is around caching to optimize the
performance across the slower communication bus (when sharing between
machines).
Hmm, sounds like a NUMA system, with a relatively low throughput and high latency interconnect. Not sure if anyone would want to do this on a workload where performance matters.

I suppose with a layer of abstraction like Xen, doing something like this is feasible. You could leverage the NUMA code in the linux kernel, but I would think you would need a very highly parallel workload to make this effective, and if you have that, a cluster setup would probably work just as well anyway.

-Andrew Theurer


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>