 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xen vbd: better.
| To: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] xen vbd: better. |
| From: | "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:28:50 -0600 (MDT) |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:37:52 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1CKuB7-0005D7-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-archive: | <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> |
| List-id: | List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-subscribe: | <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <E1CKuB7-0005D7-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Keir Fraser wrote: > > translated, it is 0x6e4f02 of capacity, 0x301 device (hda1! yay!), flags > > e0 (DISK, VIRTUAL, READONLY) (all of which I understand save VIRTUAL -- I > > guess that means a partition, not the whole disk). > > > > 0x6e4f02 is in decimal 7229186. That number makes no sense. It's not the > > number of blocks, or the number of bytes per unit, or ... > > > > Can somebody clear me up on this simple algebra problem? > > It is the capacity in 512-byte sectors. yes, but it's wrong, which is where I'm stuck. 7229186 512 * p 3701343232 it's a 10G partition, not an 3.7G partition. Any other ideas as to what could be happening here. ron ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Trying to run X in domain 1: Failed to do IOPL (was Re:USB with Xen 2.0), Steven Hand |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Xen & I/O in clusters - problems! New Information, Rune Johan Andresen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] xen vbd: better., Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] xen vbd: better., Ronald G. Minnich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
